Investigation of students perception of the online learning process during pandemic using statistical and data mining methods

Downloads

Abstract

Almost all the fields of the world suffered a tremendous crisis due to the covid 19 pandemic and especially the
education sector faced a complete transformation into a digital and online form to serve the student community
whereas the majority of students were not prepared for such transformation and struggled a lot. In this study, an
attempt was made to investigate the perception of the students who have undergone the online learning process
during pandemic. A questionnaire concerning various components of the online learning process was prepared
and an online survey was conducted among college students of Chennai, India. Data of 317 valid respondents
subjected to various statistical methods and k means clustering algorithm. The results explored that the mean
ratings of all the components ranged between (3 to 3.6) out of 5 with a standard deviation of (0.98 to 1.28). Some
demographic characteristics such as ‘Income’ and ‘Gender’ had a significant effect on the component ‘Device
and Network’. Further, the respondents are clustered into three groups of (154, 74, 89) students, independent of
all the demographic characteristics, but significantly different with respect to all the components of the survey.

Keywords:

Statistical methods, k-means clustering, students perception study, online learning process

Mathematics Subject Classification:

Mathematics
  • Kaja Mohaideen D PG Department of Mathematics, The New College, Chennai-600014, Tamil Nadu, India.
  • Fiaz Ahamed A PG Department of Mathematics, The New College, Chennai-600014, Tamil Nadu, India.
  • Mohammed Nadeemullah N PG Department of Mathematics, The New College, Chennai-600014, Tamil Nadu, India.
  • Pages: 690-696
  • Date Published: 01-01-2021
  • Vol. 9 No. 01 (2021): Malaya Journal of Matematik (MJM)

WHO Director-General's opening remarks at the media briefing on COVID-19 - 11 March 2020. general/speeches/detail/who-director-general-s-openingremarks-at-the-media-briefing-on-covid-19-11-march2020.

Transformingindia.mygov.in. 2021. Due to lockdown with reference to the COVID 19 people have faced so many issues ¡https://transformingindia.mygov.in/due-tolockdown-with-reference-to-the-covid-19-people-havefaced-so-many-issues/

Williams, M. L., Paprock, K., & Covington, B. (1998). Distance Learning: The Essential Guide. SAGE Publications, Inc.

Sabir, I. R., Akhtar, N., Bahadur, W., Sajjad, M. S., & Abbas. Impact of distance education on student performance: A case of Allama Iqbal Open University. Middle-East Journal of Scientific Research, 2014, 21(3), 472-476.

Lehmann, K.; Chamberlin, L. Making the Move to Elearning: Putting Your Course Online; R&L Education: Lanham, MD, USA, 2009.

Basilaia, G. and Kvavadze, D.. Transition to Online Education in Schools during a SARS-CoV-2 Coronavirus (COVID-19) Pandemic in Georgia. Pedagogical Research,2020,5(4).

Ruthotto, I., Kreth, Q., Stevens, J., Trively, C. and Melkers, J.Lurking and participation in the virtual classroom: The effects of gender, race, and age among graduate stu-dents in computer science. Computers & Education, 2020, 151, p.103854.

Topal, A. D. Examination of university students' level of satisfaction and readiness for e-courses and the relationship between them. European Journal of Contemporary Education,2016, 15(1), 7-23.

Horton W. Evaluating E-learning. Alexandria, VA: American Society for Training and Development,2001.

Lehmann, K.; Chamberlin, L. Making the Move to Elearning: Putting Your Course Online; R&L Education: Lanham, MD, USA, 2009.

Kamali, A.; Kianmehr, L. The Paradox of Online Education: Images, Perceptions, and Interests. US China Educ. Rev. 2015, 15, 591-601.

Almaiah MA, Al-Khasawneh A, Althunibat A. Exploring the critical challenges and factors influencing the Elearning system usage during COVID-19 pandemic. Educ Inf Technol, 2020, 1-20.

Biasutti, M. The student experience of a collaborative e-learning university module. Comput. Educ. 2011, 57 , $1865-1875$.

Roca, J.C.; Chiu, C.M.; Marthnez, F.J. Understanding e-learning continuance intention: An extension of the Technology Acceptance Model. Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud. 2013, 64, 683-696.

Hrastinski, S. A Theory of Online Learning as Online Participation. Comput. Educ. $2009,52,78-82$.

. Richardson, J. C., Maeda, Y., Lv, J., & Caskurlu, S. Social presence in relation to students' satisfaction and learning in the online environment: A meta-analysis. Computers in Human Behavior, 2017, 71, 402-417.

Hutt, M. Top 10 disadvantages of distance learning 2017, https://www.eztalks.com/elearning/top-10disadvantages-of-distance-learning.html.

Gupta, V.; Jain, N. Harnessing information and communication technologies for effective knowledge creation: Shaping the future of education. J. Enterp. Inf. Manag. $2017,30,831-855$.

Cortina, J., What is coefficient alpha? An examination of theory and applications. Journal of Applied Psychology, $1993,78(1)$, pp. $98-104$

Kuyini, A., Yeboah, K., Das, A., Alhassan, A. and Mangope, B.. Ghanaian teachers: competencies perceived as important for inclusive education. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 2016, 20(10), pp.1009-1023.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Published

01-01-2021

How to Cite

Kaja Mohaideen D, Fiaz Ahamed A, and Mohammed Nadeemullah N. “Investigation of Students Perception of the Online Learning Process During Pandemic Using Statistical and Data Mining Methods”. Malaya Journal of Matematik, vol. 9, no. 01, Jan. 2021, pp. 690-6, https://www.malayajournal.org/index.php/mjm/article/view/1114.