Strong total domination and weak total domination in Mycielski’s graphs

Downloads

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.26637/MJM0804/0060

Abstract

Let \(G=(V, E)\) be a graph. A set \(S \subseteq V\) is called a weak total dominating set (WTD-set) if each vertex \(v \in V-S\) is adjacent to a vertex \(u \in S\) with \(\operatorname{deg}(v)>\operatorname{deg}(u)\) and every vertex in \(S\) adjacent to a vertex in \(S\). The weak total domination number, denoted by \(\gamma_{\mathrm{ut}}(G)\), is minimum cardinality of a weak total dominating set. Anologuosly, a dominating set \(S \subseteq V\) is called a strong total dominating set (STD-set) if each vertex \(v \in V-S\) is dominated by some vertices \(u \in S\) with \(\operatorname{deg}(v)<\operatorname{deg}(u)\) and each vertex in \(S\) adjacent to a vertex in \(S\). The strong total domination number, denoted by \(\gamma_s(G)\), is minimum cardinality of a strong dominating set. Weak total and strong total domination parameters were introduced by Chellali et al. and Akbari and Jafari Rad, respectively.
In this paper, we consider weak total and strong total domination of Mycielski's Graph, denoted by \(\mu(G)\). We also provide some upper and lower bound about weak total domination of Mycielski's graph related with minimum and maximum degree number of a graph. In addition, the inequality about relationship between strong total domination of Mycieski's graph \(\mu(G)\) and underlying graph \(G, \gamma_{s t}(G)+1 \leq \gamma_{s t}(\mu(G)) \leq \gamma_{s t}(G)+2\), is obtained. Among other results, we characterize graphs \(G\) achieving the lower bound \(\gamma_{s t}(G)+1=\gamma_{s t}(\mu(G))\).

Keywords:

Graph Theory, Strong Total Domination,, Weak Total Domination, Mycielski’s Graph

Mathematics Subject Classification:

Mathematics
  • Pages: 1681-1686
  • Date Published: 01-10-2020
  • Vol. 8 No. 04 (2020): Malaya Journal of Matematik (MJM)

M.H. Akhbari and N. Jafari Rad, Bounds on weak and strong total domination number in graphs, Electronic Journal of Graph Theory and Applications, 4(2016), 111118.

S. Balamurgan, M. Anitha and N. Anbazhagan, Various domination parameters in Mycielski's graphs, International Journal of Pure and Applied Mathematics, 119(2018), 203-211.

M. Chellali and N. Jafari Rad, Weak total domination in graphs, Utilitas Mathematica, 94(2014), 221-236.

E.J. Cockayne, R.M. Dawes, S.T. Hedetniemi, Total Domination in graphs, Networks, 10(1980), 211-219.

D.C. Fisher, P.A. McKenna, E.D. Boyer, Hamiltonicity, diameter, domination, packing, and biclique partitions of Mycielski's graph, Discrete Applied Mathematics, 84(1998), 93-105.

T.W. Haynes, S.T. Hedetniemi, P.J. Slater (Eds.) Fundamentals of Domination in Graphs, Marcel Dekker, Inc., New York, 1998.

T.W. Haynes, S.T. Hedetniemi, P.J. Slater (Eds.) Domination in Graphs: Advanced Topics, Marcel Dekker, Inc., New York, 1998.

N. Jafari Rad, On the complexity of strong and weak total domination in graphs, Australasian Journal of Combinatorics, 65(2016), 53-58.

D.A. Mojdeh and N. Jafari Rad, On Domination and its Forcing in Mycielski's Graphs, Scientia Iranica, 15(2008), 218-222.

J. Mycielski, Sur le coloriage des graphs, Colloq. Math., 3(1955), 161-162.

E. Sampathkumar and L. Pushpa Latha, Strong, weak domination and domination balance in graphs, Discrete Math., 161(1996), 235-242.

  • NA

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Published

01-10-2020

How to Cite

Hande Tunc¸el G¨olpek, and Aysun Aytac¸. “Strong Total Domination and Weak Total Domination in Mycielski’s Graphs”. Malaya Journal of Matematik, vol. 8, no. 04, Oct. 2020, pp. 1681-6, doi:10.26637/MJM0804/0060.